For the past few decades, Global Warming/ Global Cooling/Climate Change or whatever else they are calling it these days, has been a political talking point. The fact that this came out of nowhere, and pretty much became a topic, after Al Gore decided to get involved, doesn’t seem to phase some people. I was a Freshman in college, when I first heard about it. I started to fall for it but decided I needed to know all of the information, before jumping on that train. Media bias has been great for spreading the whole climate change agenda by the democrats. This is a mostly one sided agenda. So let’s see if the science backs it up.
The whole premise of Global warming is that the Earth’s atmosphere is rising. The touters claim it is man made, caused by increased CO2 (greenhouse gases) emissions. They claim that it directly affects and manipulates changes in rainfall patterns, extreme weather, arrivals of seasons, and more. When the weather no longer followed this model, the talking points changed. This phenomenon then became global cooling, about a decade or so ago. Global cooling is known as the imminent cooling of the Earth, culminating in a period of extensive glaciation, due to the cooling effects of aerosols and orbital forcing. Then another warming cycle came about, during the Obama Presidency, and the name was changed again, to climate change. Climate change is defined as a change in global or regional climate patterns attributed largely to the increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide produced by the use of fossil fuels.
The constant flip flopping from the proponents, caused me to delve even further. One thing science isn’t is ever changing, it is usually concise and concrete. Here is what I have been able to find.
A new scientific study, recently released, has revealed the following: Current CO2 levels of 410 parts per million (ppm) were last seen on Earth three million years ago, according to the most detailed reconstruction of the Earth’s climate by researchers at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and published in Science Advances.
3 million years ago, there was no human life, no vehicles, no fossil fuel use, no greenhouse gases. The study goes on to say: Temperatures were up to 7 degrees warmer globally, at least double that at the poles, and sea levels were some 20 meters (65 feet) higher. This is important because AOC has been touting that we have only 10-12 years left to live. The media and all the democrats have literally bought into this. Think Progress, a progressive organization, goes on to say this: “The good news is that the Earth does not warm instantly, and mile-thick ice sheets melt even more slowly. So the temperature rise will take several decades, and tens of feet of sea level rise will take hundreds and hundreds of years.”
90 Italian scientists have signed a detailed letter to lawmakers, which challenges the claim that man is causing catastrophic global warming and that CO2 emissions are the culprit. They said that “policies should be consistent with science.” They say that “CO2 is not in itself a pollutant.” CO2 is actually plant food. Trees and plants need it to live and thrive. Plants then release oxygen into the atmosphere. They go on to state, “the anthropic origin of global warming is an unproven hypothesis, deduced only from some climate simulation models. The advanced alarmist forecasts, therefore, are not credible, since they are based on models whose results contradict the experimental data.” The climate simulation models “overestimate the anthropic contribution and underestimate the natural climatic variability.”
For example, there is no correlation between rising CO2 levels and increased tropical cyclone activity. There is, however, a strong correlation between cyclonic activity and the completely natural Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation, an oscillation that runs in roughly 60 year cycles. The scientists continue to state, “The scientific method dictates that the facts, not the number of adherents, make a conjecture a consolidated scientific theory.” Their petition demonstrates ,clearly, the absence of a scientific consensus on the matter. The list of signers includes professors of physics, atmospheric physics, physical chemistry, natural sciences, environmental engineering, astronomy, applied geology, volcanology, meteorology and climatology, oceanography, satellite interferometry (a family of techniques in which waves, usually electromagnetic waves, are superimposed, causing the phenomenon of interference, which is used to extract information), hydrogeology, and probability and mathematical statistics.
Why would people, mostly politicians, keep touting something that isn’t true? Money and control, pure and simple. Recent global warming agreements, brokered by the UN, require major reductions in world C02 output. They want to slow the presumed warming of the earth’s atmosphere, while also seeking alterations in the economy, that would move energy sources away from fossil fuels and toward renewable natural energy. Obama and. the democrats eagerly signed on to the deal. Trump, however, has reversed that and is promoting fossil fuels.
The senate actually voted on whether or not Climate change was a hoax back in 2015, so there was still skepticism, even in our own government. Here is scientific evidence that proves climate change doesn’t exist. In 2014, there was record Ice in Antarctica, record snowfall, Lake Superior only had 3 ice free months and their was record cold weather. There hasn’t been any warming since 1997. 31,487 scientists also signed a petition, against Global Warming, which states that global warming is not man made. More than 1000 International scientists challenged the UN, Al Gore and IPCC because they say there is no global warming. Polar sea ice is up 50% since 2012, growing from 6,000 to 9,000 cubic km in 2013. 2013’s multi-year ice is 30 cm thicker than 2012’s, which indicates healthy Arctic sea-ice cover.
95% of Climate change models are wrong. Oceans are rising much less than predicted. Many tide gauges show no rise in sea level, and almost none show any acceleration over the past 20 years. Polar bears are thriving. They were supposed to do terrible in 2014, which was supposed to be the hottest year ever. Moose are making a come back. A few years ago, the moose population in Minnesota dropped rapidly. They found out it was due to the wolves, not global warming, even though that is what it was blamed on.
In 2009, emails were discovered from The University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research unit that exposed how scientist’s have manipulated the data to match the narrative. The emails also exposed conspiracies to falsify data and withhold the findings, that cast serious doubt on the man-made global warming theory, to exaggerate the existence and threats posed by global warming, and to obstruct contrary research from appearing in scholarly publications. They also showed how they were aided and abetted by the complicit media. The climate crisis industry portrayed the scandal as much ado about nothing, and continued beating the drums of climate hysteria, as if nothing had happened. This was referred to as Climate gate.
WaPo reported that NASA helped to manipulate the data. “Under pressure in 2007, NASA recalculated its data and found that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states. NASA later changed that data again, and now 1998 and 2006 are tied for first, with 1934 slightly cooler.” Since this occurred, around the time of Climate gate scandal, Chris Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute filed a lawsuit to get NASA to release their relevant data on this issue and was able to expose emails from NASA that revealed a disturbing fact. The agency admitted “that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit”. This means that the NASA climate change data was less accurate than East Anglia. In 2011, more emails were released. This time, it showed how they tried to expose a skeptic of their narrative. In 2015, WaPo highlighted another example of NASA manipulating the numbers.
When we look at the money involved, it explains it all. $32.9 billion was spent on research from 1989-2009. This doesn’t include the $79 billion spent for related climate change technology research, foreign aid and tax breaks for “green energy.” In the summer of 2014, a minority staff report from the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works gave details on a “Billionaire’s Club. ” This club is a shady network of charitable foundations that distributes billions to advance climate alarmism. The report shows that nonprofits, such as the Energy Foundation and Tides Foundation, distributed billions to leftist green groups, such as the Natural Resources Defense Council. These groups then send staff to the EPA, who then direct federal grants back to these same green groups. The only media that reported on this was the National Review.
This is where the power comes into play. Climate change’s sole purpose is to destroy capitalism in the US, the world’s largest capitalist nation, to pave the way for our nation’s sovereignty being handed over to a global governing authority, run by the United Nations. This sounds insane, I know, but this is true. During my research, I stumbled upon quotes from people associated with the UN.
Christiana Figueres served as Executive Secretary of the UN’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. What she said, is what brought me to the realization that there is indeed a hidden agenda. In February of 2015, Figueres said “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.” This economic model to which she refers to is free-market capitalism. A year earlier, Figueres revealed what U.S. capitalism must be replaced with. She complained that our two-party constitutional republic is hampering the UN’s climate objectives. She went on to cite China’s communist system as the kind of government America must have if the UN is to do as it pleases. In other words, if the UN is to have its way, America must become a communist nation.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, what Dr. Ottmar Edenhofer had to say will leave your jaw on the floor. In a Nov. 14, 2010 interview with Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Edenhofer, co-chair of the UN IPCC’s Working Group III, at that time, said “One must free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. [What we’re doing] has almost nothing to do with the climate. We must state clearly that we use climate policy to [re]distribute de facto the world’s wealth.”
On the same day, Edenhofer added this: “Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with protecting the environment. The next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which [re]distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated.” Dr. Ottmar Edenhofer, is one of the UN’s top climate officials. He effectively admitted that the organization’s public position on climate change is a complete farce.
The same admission was made in July 2019 by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, who told governor Jay Inslee (D-WA) that the Green New Deal has nothing to do with saving the planet. “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all. Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing” In other words, the intent of the Green New Deal is to use climate alarmism as a false flag excuse for dismantling our capitalist economy.
Figueres, Edenhofer and Chakrabarti aren’t the only high profile communists to recognize the effectiveness of using environmental hysteria, to hide their true intent. In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev advocated using climate change to incite a global communist revolution: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.” The “new world order” to which he referred is global governance under the banner of the hammer and sickle. For global governance to happen, our sovereignty must be ceded to the UN, an organization that is infested, from top to bottom, with revolutionary Marxists hell-bent on disemboweling western civilization. Let’s face it, this has always been their goal and always will be. Powerful globalists don’t think it is fair that billions of people, in the world, sleep on the ground in mud huts, while Americans sleep on soft mattresses in air-conditioned comfort. They also feel that we must share our wealth, to an unprecedented extent, with poor nations of the world, whose government mismanages their money. Global wealth redistribution is the foremost tenet of communism, and those who advocate it are by definition communists, whether they are open about it or not.
These proclamations alone are evidence enough to conclude that climate alarmism is being used as a Trojan horse, to justify the stratospheric new carbon taxes clamored for by progressive elites like Al Gore, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Not one of them has ever denounced the profoundly anti-American sentiments of two of the UN’s top climate officials. Obama’s whole campaign, both years was to fundamentally transform the United States of America. He revealed that such taxes would be used not for environmental healing, but to fund the most massive redistribution of wealth in history, literally trillions of dollars, extracted under false pretenses from hard-working U.S. taxpayers, and handed over to corrupt governments of every undeveloped nation on earth, all in the guise of “climate aid.” Upon further research, there are many others, even here in America, that subscribe to this vision. Which you can read more about here.
Progressives in high places are attempting the largest heist in human history, a collusion to plunder unprecedented sums of money, from us, US taxpayers. Why? To implement, on a global scale, the mandate set forth in The Communist Manifesto: “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” The UN was outraged by President Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords, because it dealt their plan, to redistribute America’s wealth, a setback. The high profile socialists who preach climate change would have you believe that they’re nothing more than environmentally concerned citizens, who would never dream of participating in a subversive attempt to quietly turn their country communist. These wolves in sheep’s clothing have deceived you, and now you know it. No intelligent person, can fail to see that the modern Democratic Party is using climate alarmism as a ruse to help culminate Barack Obama’s vow. Make no mistake, the UN and global elite, even the democrat party, is coming for our liberty.
I had no idea that this would lead so far down the rabbit hole. All the listed evidence is just a small amount of the proof that exists. We “deniers”, as we are called, have been correct. There is no such thing as climate change. The weather is controlled by natural solar cycles. However, the plot, is much more sinister, than any of us have ever imagined. The world we live in is getting scarier and scarier. We cannot allow this to happen. We need to cancel the UN.